URL: https://stroud.moderngov.co.uk/ieDecisionDetails.aspx?ID=342

Decision Maker: Environment Committee

Outcome:

Is Key Decision?: No

Is Callable In?: No

Purpose: Update to the Contaminated Land Inspection Strategy.

Content: The Environmental Protection Manager introduced the report. He explained that the council was required to produce a Contaminated Land Inspection Strategy and that the proposed strategy was a revision on the Council’s 2001 strategy. The updated strategy included: Refreshed guidance on radioactive contaminated land regulations. Reflected updated Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA) guidance. Included updated guidance on category four screening levels. Regulation on emerging contaminants such as per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). Incorporation of climate change considerations into the risk assessment process.   The updated strategy would help to inform a structured approach to investigation on a risk basis either via available funding or through the planning process.   In response to the Chair, the Environmental Protection Manager explained that there was national guidance as to potential sources of PFAS, and the Environmental Protection team would assess these to identify any within the district. They would then carry out the appropriate risk assessment to determine where the site was on the priority list.   Councillor Dutton proposed, and Councillor Canning seconded.   Councillor Dutton explained that it was helpful to see the changes set out clearly in the report. She considered it interesting to know what work had already been undertaken on priority sites and reassuring that sites were continually being looked at.   Councillor Watson highlighted the list of circa 1,300 untested suspected contaminated land sites in the district and expressed concern that emerging contaminates could raise the number. She criticised the lack of funding opportunities from central government for investigating sites and the reactive nature of inspections. She drew examples from two sites in her ward and welcomed the work of the Environmental Health team in working with herself and other Members on those projects. She welcomed the updated policy as a new minimum but urged Officers to take more proactive action where risks were high.   On being put to a vote, the motion was carried unanimously.   RESOLVED To approve the updated Strategy.    

Date of Decision: February 26, 2026