URL: https://democracy.huntingdonshire.gov.uk/moderngov/ieDecisionDetails.aspx?ID=11995

Decision Maker: Cabinet

Outcome:

Is Key Decision?: Yes

Is Callable In?: No

Purpose: The report explains the reasons for reviewing and implementing changes to discretionary Charges in Planning, Infrastructure and Public Protection, focusing on enhancing service delivery, covering rising operational costs, reacting to national government changes and ensuring the sustainability of the services.

Content: The report explains the reasons for reviewing and implementing changes to discretionary Charges in Planning, Infrastructure and Public Protection, focusing on enhancing service delivery, covering rising operational costs, reacting to national government changes and ensuring the sustainability of the services. The Cabinet has noted the contents of the report.   Additionally, the Cabinet has recommended to Council   (a)  that the review of Discretionary Charges within Planning, Infrastructure and Public Protection be endorsed, and authority be delegated to the Head of Planning, Infrastructure and Public Protection, in consultation with the Section 151 Officer and Executive Councillor for Finance & Resources, to implement changes; and   (b)  that authority be delegated to the Head of Planning, Infrastructure and Public Protection, in consultation with the Section 151 Officer and Executive Councillor for Finance & Resources, to undertake the following, for the current financial year:     i.  Introduction of new fees   ii.  Modification of existing fees   iii.  Updating/adjusting of fees   iv.  Waiving of fees   The Council is committed to continue the Development Management Improvement programme to improve the performance of the planning service as outlined in the Corporate Plan 2023-2028 and is committed to following through on the recommendations of the Planning Peer Review.   The Council recognises the important responsibilities it must undertake in monitoring BNG within the district but acknowledges this will be a financial burden. Therefore, appropriate monitoring fees must be imposed. Two options were considered:   ·  Option 1: Review and update discretionary fees in line with peer review recommendations – recommended. ·  Option 2: Maintain current fees – not recommended, as it risks financial shortfalls and missed opportunities for local biodiversity investment.     There are no resource implications.

Date of Decision: June 17, 2025